When transferring USDT on the TRON blockchain or using decentralized applications (DApp), users often face the issue of "insufficient energy," leading to skyrocketing transaction fees. The concept of "energy" in the TRON network can be likened to data packages in mobile communication. When energy is depleted, users need to replenish it; otherwise, their operations will be hindered, forcing them to pay additional TRX as transaction fees, which undoubtedly increases the cost burden on users.



How to obtain "energy" more economically has become a focus for TRON users. Although the energy rental feature built into the wallet is convenient to use, its price fluctuates significantly, and during peak times, it may even exceed the cost of directly paying transaction fees. To save on expenses and avoid hassle, we need to gain a deeper understanding of how TRON energy operates.

TRON energy essentially represents the network's resources. On the TRON chain, whether it is for transferring or executing smart contracts, a certain amount of energy must be consumed. If users do not have enough energy, they must pay an equivalent amount of TRX as a transaction fee.

Currently, users have several ways to meet energy demands:
1. Directly pay TRX as a fee, but this method often has a higher cost.
2. Rent energy to acquire the necessary network resources by paying a smaller fee.
3. Freeze TRX to gain energy, but this method has less flexibility.

By comparing actual cases, we can see the differences in energy rental prices between different platforms. For example, using certain wallet rentals to exchange TRX to USDT(BSC) may require about 3.27 TRX of energy, and sometimes even more than 10 TRX. However, using some professional energy rental platforms, the cost for the same operation may drop to around 1.92 TRX.

This means that each transaction can save at least 1 TRX, and in some cases, it can save up to 8 TRX. The energy purchase costs can differ by as much as 4 times between different platforms. For users who frequently make transactions, choosing the right way to acquire energy can significantly reduce overall transaction costs.

As the TRON ecosystem continues to develop, more and more users are beginning to focus on how to effectively manage energy consumption. By comparing energy leasing prices across different platforms and selecting the most cost-effective option, users can minimize unnecessary expenses while ensuring smooth transactions. This is beneficial not only for individual users but also for the healthy development of the entire TRON network.
TRX-0.45%
DAPP-3.43%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainMelonWatchervip
· 08-16 03:48
Buying energy is much more cost-effective than paying gas.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaBrainvip
· 08-15 17:52
Hey guys who play Tron, look here!
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFundvip
· 08-15 07:38
So it's true that suckers voluntarily get played for suckers, right?
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueenvip
· 08-14 09:50
The energy leasing interface design is too rough, and there is no price cap constraint.
View OriginalReply0
WalletsWatchervip
· 08-14 09:50
Just use it, we can talk about the price later.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBotvip
· 08-14 09:43
The transaction fees for TRX are really too expensive.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatchervip
· 08-14 09:38
Nothing is better than freezing TRX for stability.
View OriginalReply0
SadMoneyMeowvip
· 08-14 09:32
Frozen trx forever god
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)