📢 Gate广场独家活动: #PUBLIC创作大赛# 正式开启!
参与 Gate Launchpool 第 297 期 — PublicAI (PUBLIC),并在 Gate广场发布你的原创内容,即有机会瓜分 4,000 枚 $PUBLIC 奖励池!
🎨 活动时间
2025年8月18日 10:00 – 2025年8月22日 16:00 (UTC)
📌 参与方式
在 Gate广场发布与 PublicAI (PUBLIC) 或当前 Launchpool 活动相关的原创内容
内容需不少于 100 字(可为分析、教程、创意图文、测评等)
添加话题: #PUBLIC创作大赛#
帖子需附带 Launchpool 参与截图(如质押记录、领取页面等)
🏆 奖励设置(总计 4,000 枚 $PUBLIC)
🥇 一等奖(1名):1,500 $PUBLIC
🥈 二等奖(3名):每人 500 $PUBLIC
🥉 三等奖(5名):每人 200 $PUBLIC
📋 评选标准
内容质量(相关性、清晰度、创意性)
互动热度(点赞、评论)
含有 Launchpool 参与截图的帖子将优先考虑
📄 注意事项
所有内容须为原创,严禁抄袭或虚假互动
获奖用户需完成 Gate广场实名认证
Gate 保留本次活动的最终解释权
Judge pushes jury to end Storm trial after days of gridlock
After four days of deliberations, jurors in the Roman Storm trial told the court they remain deadlocked on some charges, prompting the use of an Allen charge to encourage further discussion.
An Allen charge, sometimes called a “dynamite charge,” is a special instruction a judge gives to a deadlocked jury, urging them to re-examine their positions and attempt to reach a unanimous verdict.
According to court reports on Wednesday by Inner City Press, Storm’s lawyer Brian Klein opposed the charge, arguing that the jury had made it clear a unanimous verdict was unlikely and instead urged the court to consider accepting a partial verdict.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla sided with prosecutors, who preferred to push for continued deliberations rather than accept a partial verdict, with Assistant US attorney Thane Arad saying, “Let’s cross that bridge when we get there.”
The move keeps the trial alive and delays a potential mistrial, but also highlights the jury’s deep divisions over key aspects of the government’s case.
Related: SEC’s Peirce defends transaction privacy as Tornado Cash verdict looms
Tornado Cash trial verdict could set precedent for crypto developer liability
Storm, co-founder of the Ethereum-based mixer Tornado Cash, is accused of conspiring to launder over $1 billion in illicit funds, including money tied to hackers from North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Prosecutors argue he actively promoted the tool to criminals and ignored warnings about its misuse.
The defense claims Storm wrote open-source code and had no control over how it was used, raising broader questions about liability for software developers in decentralized systems.
The case has significant implications for crypto developers and the liability boundaries for writing decentralized software. If convicted on all counts and given the maximum penalties, Storm could face up to 45 years in prison.
Legal Panel: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in stablecoin fight