The rise of agentic DeFi requires infrastructure that is both trustless and composable.
@TheoriqAI is tackling the coordination problem with AlphaSwarm.
Basically Agents execute yield and trading strategies but are held accountable through staking and slashing mechanisms.
This means trust is not just promised but actually earned, in public.
@MitosisOrg provides the programmable liquidity layer these agents can actually use.
miAssets are yield-bearing by default, so agents are never holding idle collateral.
Every position can then be recycled into new strategies.
Then there is @cysic_xyz.
Their

The BSKT Lab beta of @AlvaraProtocol’s has the perfect timing for the “Coin Everything” meta.
Why launch one token when you can tokenize an entire portfolio?
They let us create whole onchain ETFs with ANY thesis you want.
Investment Wanker NFT is still minting until 21st (just 5 days left!).
Costs just 0.01 ETH, is fully transferable, and has 6-month ALVA yield stream plus veALVA revenue share from protocol fees.

.@AlvaraProtocol just launched BSKT Lab Beta for the “Coin Everything” meta.
Instead of launching single tokens, create entire tokenized portfolios as one asset. Onchain ETFs made simple.
Investment Wanker (lol) NFT mint live until 21st. 0.01 ETH gets you 6 months of ALVA staking yield plus protocol revenue share.

This is absolutely MASSIVE for the agent economy.
@wardenprotocol just hit 400K+ daily users and proved crypto agents have real product-market fit.
Now they’re doubling down with their updated manifesto.
Instead of building infrastructure and hoping users come, they flipped the script:
> Win users first with agents that make crypto 10x easier
> Prove PMF by solving crypto’s broken UX
> Open the rails so anyone can build and monetize agents
1.5M daily chats powering agents trading, staking, bridging, creating NFTs is genuinely insane.
And all that through natural language.
This is the infrast

.@union_build's Galois framework follows three principles that every ZK project should copy:
1. Fast execution
2. Low-cost operation
3. True decentralization
And the best part? It runs on a single machine.
Compared to other ZK bridges needing data centers, Galois outperforms while running on consumer hardware.
This aligns with @theblessnetwork's vision. Edge computing meets ZK proving. Or in other words: Your laptop contributing to cross-chain security.
@TheoriqAI agents need this efficiency. I mean, we simply can’t have AI swarms waiting for expensive proof generation. Galois makes real-tim

.@SuperseedXYZ built something genuinely new: self-repaying loans.
Their L2 channels all network fees into a Dynamic Repayment Vault that automatically pays down loan balances.
$SUPR tokenomics are interesting too:
> 100% of protocol fees to holders
> 2% yearly inflation distributed via daily auctions
> $1.5M market cap at $0.0022
The auction mechanism is clever - repayers compete to win new SUPR by committing stablecoins to repay supercollateral loans.
Now tradable on Base through @AerodromeFi. No CEX listings yet.
It has some similarities to @GOATRollup's approach - both are solving capital

.@BitcoinBridge_ by Electron charges just 0.1% fees. That's 10x cheaper than most other BTC bridges.
Their calculator shows the savings:
Moving BTC between chains for DeFi yields is ofc much needed. I mean, they alone make $1.5B+ monthly volume, handled by their liquidity engine.
Ofc this reminds me of @Lombard_Finance LBTC, as both are enabling BTC productivity across chains. Different approaches to the same problem.

Yes, you can buy $PENGU and hold it for 6 months to farm the @AbstractChain airdrop
But you can also just buy @katana’s one and only real memecoin (which is literally followed by half the Katana team and even their CEO @0xMarcB) and then sell it after a 1000x
gKitsu

.@union_build just dropped their technical deep dive and the consensus verification approach is actually interesting to read about.
Let me explain.
They're doing something different from every other bridge:
Validators on Chain A verify consensus of Chain B directly. No middlemen or no multisigs, but cryptographic proofs that consensus happened.
Combined with ZK proofs for aggregation, this means:
> Instant settlement across chains
> No trust assumptions
> Scales beyond current settlement layers
This bring SO many possibilities.
@boundless_xyz is taking another approach. Yes, both use ZK for in

Mantle / $MNT just had an INSANE 24 hours
The market cap is up by 23% to above 3B (5.5B FDV)
And it wasn’t a low volume move either: $546M+
I also noticed that recently @Mantle_Official has been pivoting their comms from ‘just’ an Ethereum L2, to calling themselves THE Blockchain for Banking.
That might be the reason for these recent pumps. I’m curious to see if we’re gonna get some big announcement anytime soon

Another weekly @GOATRollup recap and this one's PACKED.
Community exploded to 157k members with 21k new GOATs in one week.
The momentum is getting ridiculous.
But what matters is of course what they’re actually shipping:
Real-time proving went live on their BitVM2 testnet. We're talking 2.6 second block proofs. Not hours. Not minutes. SECONDS.
This matters because every other Bitcoin L2 makes you wait forever for withdrawals. GOAT just made them instant.
They're using Ziren zkVM from @ProjectZKM to power this. GPU-accelerated provers running in parallel. No bottlenecks even under heavy load.
M

I repeat once again:
DeFi has a complexity problem.
Being able to use DeBank to get some structure into this complexity is nice. But we all know it is not a solution, merely a tool to work with this chaotic complexity.
There are many projects trying to solve this complexity at different levels:
> Katana is solving it with chain-native yield infra.
> Lombard is solving it with frictionless BTC yield and crosschain usage.
> Turtle is solving it with structured vault strategies and clear liquidity campaigns.
INFINIT is solving it at the coordination level.
Instead of one strategy or chain, you ge