比特币

This article offers an in-depth look at the Bitcoin market's potential bottoming process by examining the influence of macroeconomic conditions, Federal Reserve policies, trade policies, and regulatory environments. It explores the movement of funds in whale addresses, institutional investments, and Bitcoin price trends.

Meme coins like DEGEN, TURBO, and SATS, as well as strategies like Blast’s UI and Base’s growth tactics, have been rapidly replicated across the market. Yet, many of these copycat projects have succeeded. This article analyses the inner logic and patterns of success and failure behind the "Replica Economy" through on-chain data, community structures, and distribution mechanisms.

This article introduces Thunderbolt, an experimental protocol upgrade designed to enhance Bitcoin's performance. Though not yet approved by core developers, miners, or nodes, we will explore its background, core technical principles, operational mechanism, potential impacts, current challenges, and future directions.

This report presents a systematic study of gold, the Nasdaq Index (including both Composite and Nasdaq-100), and Bitcoin (BTC), aiming to uncover their return characteristics, volatility clustering, correlation evolution, and the applicability of trading strategies under various macroeconomic contexts.

The history of cryptocurrency development has repeatedly proven: the darkest hours often give birth to the brightest dawn. Whether it's short-term pain from sudden events or prolonged aftershocks triggered by a crisis of trust, the market consistently revives with remarkable resilience, paving the way for new heights under emerging narratives.

This article exposes the truth about Bitcoin DeFi projects. Due to Bitcoin's lack of a Turing-complete virtual machine, projects like BitVM, Rootstock, Sovryn, and BitcoinOS are either heavily centralized or impractical to implement. These projects employ misleading marketing to hide their centralization risks—ultimately creating a collective delusion fueled by greed and ignorance. The article demonstrates that Bitcoin cannot fundamentally support true decentralized finance, a limitation that will likely persist for the foreseeable future.

On the first anniversary of Bitcoin’s 2024 halving, prices range between $80,000 and $90,000. In terms of percentage gains, this is the weakest post-halving performance on record. Historically, Bitcoin typically experienced strong rebounds within 12 months after each halving: after the 2012 halving, BTC’s price skyrocketed by an astonishing 7,000%, while the 2016 and 2020 cycles saw gains of 291% and 541%, respectively. So far, the 2024 cycle has yet to follow this trend. Except for 2012, the price rallies that usually emerged nine months post-halving have clearly disappeared this time.

Unlike previous halving cycles that saw explosive price surges, this cycle has experienced a more subdued increase of just 31%, compared to a 436% rise in the same timeframe during the previous cycle. Long-term holder metrics (like the MVRV ratio) show a sharp decline in unrealized profits, suggesting a maturing market with compressed upside potential.

This article analyzes the correlation between Bitcoin prices and factors such as global liquidity, the U.S. stock market, and fiscal deficits. It also argues that the correlation between Bitcoin and the U.S. stock market may be spurious. The article further explores the impact of the Trump administration's trade policies on global capital flows, and the potential implications for Bitcoin prices.

Standing at the crossroads of Bitcoin's technological evolution, we see three distinct paths: Nubit represents native scaling and adherence to Bitcoin's values; Babylon embodies the pursuit of cross-chain integration and capital efficiency; Bitlayer showcases a pragmatic choice of copying successful models.

Gate Research's latest report, "2025 Q1 BTC Network Review," presents a detailed analysis of Bitcoin's market performance, on-chain activity, transaction costs, ecosystem evolution, mining metrics, and technical upgrades in Q1 2025. The report offers key insights into the state and future direction of the Bitcoin network.

A crypto bull market typically ends after certain patterns emerge. This article analyzes 25 key indicators across 7 major categories—price valuation, technical analysis, capital flows, on-chain data, stablecoin leverage, market sentiment, and altcoin rotation—to help investors assess whether the market is overheating. It provides a detailed breakdown of each indicator’s calculation, application, and interpretation, along with an analysis of the current market conditions. The goal is to enhance readers’ ability to take profits wisely and avoid missing the best exit opportunities due to greed. By evaluating multi-dimensional indicators, investors can more accurately predict potential market tops and make smarter investment decisions.

In 2024, gold prices broke through $3,000 per ounce with a total market cap of $20.14 trillion, while Bitcoin’s market cap surged to $1.55 trillion, narrowing the gap between digital and traditional assets. This marks a significant challenge from cryptocurrency to traditional stores of value. With its scarcity, technological advantages, and growing institutional adoption, Bitcoin is emerging as a new focal point for global liquidity and safe-haven assets — potentially ushering in the digital currency era.

In April 2025, Bitcoin’s price fluctuated between $83,700 and $85,200, failing to break a key resistance level. Strong U.S. economic data dampened expectations of a Fed rate cut and suppressed risk-on sentiment. Meanwhile, gold hit a record high, drawing attention to Bitcoin’s trajectory. Analysts forecast Bitcoin may enter a parabolic growth phase in H2 2025, with a potential target of $400,000. Rising global tariff uncertainty further highlights Bitcoin’s appeal as a safe-haven asset. Investors should watch the complementary dynamic between gold and Bitcoin amid mounting macro risks.

In the global Bitcoin mining landscape, the U.S. leads with a monthly hash rate share of 37.84%. However, after Trump’s announcement of new tariffs, the American Bitcoin mining industry may be dragged into the mire of a trade war.